Qi Gong Origins: India, Buddhism and Shaolin
Qi Gong is Chinese in origin. It grew from China’s early health-and-longevity traditions, including daoyin—therapeutic movement and breath training used to nourish life. It did not arrive as a single system “imported from India”.
Yet India still matters in the story. Buddhism travelled from India into East Asia over many centuries. With it came serious meditation culture. Monks needed strong, steady bodies to sit for long periods. So breath, posture, and simple conditioning practices often travelled alongside the teachings.
This created a real bridge between Indian ideas of prana (life-force linked with breath) and Chinese ideas of qi (vital energy). The two aren’t identical. But they rhyme. In temple life, especially in places like Shaolin, that exchange could have influenced how internal training was explained, organised, and preserved.
So the clearest answer is this: Qi Gong is Chinese at its roots, and Buddhist transmission from India likely shaped parts of its temple-based evolution.
New to Qi Gong? Start with What Is Qi Gong? Origins, Principles & Benefits:
https://brightbeingsacademy.com/post/what-is-qi-gong
Want a gentle structure to practise (without overwhelm)? Begin here:
https://brightbeingsacademy.com/qi-gong-for-beginners
Practise Qi Gong from the comfort of your own home - Live Korean Style Qi Gong classes
A simple promise before we begin
If you’ve ever felt that Qi Gong, yoga, meditation, and martial arts all share a hidden common language… you’re picking up something real.
Across Asia, spiritual practice often included body training—not as “fitness”, but as mind-and-breath cultivation. And when Buddhism travelled out of India, it didn’t just carry philosophy. It carried practices—ways of breathing, sitting, moving, focusing, and regulating the inner world.
So the big question becomes:
Did Qi Gong come from India?
Or is it something else—something more like a braid of influences?
The most honest (and most powerful) answer is:
Qi Gong is Chinese in origin, rooted in Chinese daoyin and yangsheng traditions—yet Buddhist transmission created a bridge where Indian bodily and breath-based methods likely influenced how internal cultivation was practised, labelled, and preserved (especially in monasteries). (journalofyogastudies.org)
If you’d like to feel what we mean by breath–body–mind while you read, start with one of these short foundations first:
What we can say with confidence (and what gets “sketchy”)
I’m going to keep your credibility strong by separating evidence, reasonable inference, and legend.
Solid ground (strong evidence)
China had embodied health traditions long before Shaolin legends, often grouped under daoyin (“guiding and pulling”). (Deutsches Kampfsportmuseum)
The Mawangdui “Physical Exercise Chart on Silk” depicts 44 illustrated therapeutic postures—an early witness to daoyin-style practice (often discussed as a precursor stream to later Qigong culture). (hnmuseum.com)
Shaolin Temple is commonly dated to 495 CE, associated with Northern Wei patronage, and early leadership connected with Indian/central Asian Buddhist transmission narratives. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Reasonable inference (plausible, but not a single “smoking gun”)
As Buddhism moved across land and sea routes, bodily practices travelled too—through monks, translators, and temple communities who needed stable bodies for deep meditation. (courtauld.ac.uk)
Historical scholarship explores intersections between Indian yogic/postural therapies and Chinese daoyin in medieval China. (journalofyogastudies.org)
Legend (meaningful, culturally influential, but debated)
Bodhidharma as “inventor of kung fu” is widely treated as a later storyline. Even Encyclopædia Britannica phrases it as something he was “credited with”. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
The Yijin Jing attribution to Bodhidharma is contested; academic work discusses a 17th-century text history (with later editions and evolving attributions). (ORA)
If you want the modern research lens (and a clear safety-first approach), these will strengthen the article’s credibility and next steps:
A beginner-friendly timeline (then we’ll go deeper)
Before we step into the timeline, one quick note on where legend begins. Shaolin stories—especially those linking Bodhidharma to martial training and internal exercises—are deeply influential in the culture of Qi Gong and kung fu, and they’ve shaped how generations understand “meditation with a strong body”.
Some elements are supported by historical records (like Shaolin’s early Buddhist context), while other details developed through later storytelling and lineage tradition.
Rather than dismissing the legend or treating it as literal fact, we’ll hold it in the most useful way: as a powerful teaching narrative that sits alongside the documented history.
If you’d like full transparency on the historical anchors behind this section, please scroll down to Key historical sources (for readers who want to go deeper).
Chapter 1 — China already had movement therapy (2nd century BCE)
Long before Shaolin becomes famous, we have evidence of structured therapeutic movement in China.
The Henan Museum presents the “Physical Exercise Chart on Silk” as a coloured chart with 44 human figures showing different exercises. (hnmuseum.com)
Beginner translation:
People were already practising breath-body exercises for health and longevity.
This matters because it stops us making the simplistic claim:
“Qi Gong began when Indian monks arrived.”
A more accurate foundation is:
China had a living base of embodied self-cultivation.
Chapter 2 — Buddhism spreads out of India (3rd century BCE onward)
Buddhism doesn’t spread in one neat line. It spreads in waves:
imperial missions,
monastic networks,
trade routes,
translation communities,
and eventually, temple lineages.
A well-known early turning point is Ashoka’s era, with traditions describing missions carrying Buddhism beyond India, including to Sri Lanka. Encyclopædia Britannica notes Buddhism was brought to Sri Lanka by a mission during Ashoka’s reign. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Now widen the lens: Buddhism also travelled by sea. A Courtauld research paper describes sea-based transmission between South and Southeast Asia sustained through monks and networks across centuries. (courtauld.ac.uk)
Beginner translation:
If teachings can travel, so can methods. Breath, posture, and meditation skills often travel with the teaching.
Chapter 3 — Maritime routes + Southeast Asia + “practice exchange”
You specifically asked about movement through Southeast Asia—so here’s a grounded way to talk about it.
A contemporary overview notes early strands of Buddhism reaching Vietnam by the 2nd century CE via maritime trade routes and blending with local traditions. (Tricycle: The Buddhist Review)
This matters because it shows the “bridge” wasn’t only the Silk Road. It was also ships, ports, temples, and translators.
And in those real places—ports and monasteries—body methods tend to be exchanged in quiet, practical ways:
“Here’s how we sit without pain.”
“Here’s how we breathe to calm the mind.”
“Here’s a movement set to keep the body strong for long meditation.”
That’s the kind of transmission you can responsibly suggest—without claiming a single founder.
Chapter 4 — Shaolin (495 CE): where meditation meets conditioning
Shaolin’s founding date (495 CE) is widely referenced, including Encyclopædia Britannica, which links its early history with Indian monastic presence and translation activity. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
A University of Southern California (USC) overview also states Shaolin was established in 495 and headed by an Indian monk known in Chinese as Batuo (Buddhabhadra). (china.usc.edu)
Beginner translation:
Temples weren’t just “religious buildings.” They were training grounds for the mind—and therefore the body.
Chapter 5 — Bodhidharma enters the story (5th–6th century, legend grows later)
Here’s the cleanest way to handle Bodhidharma:
Encyclopædia Britannica says he was “credited with” aiding Shaolin monks in meditation and training. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
That phrase—credited with—is gold. It lets you honour the tradition while signalling that the story became powerful over time.
You can frame it like this:
As history: Bodhidharma is an important figure in the growth of Chan/Zen lineages. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
As temple tradition: Bodhidharma becomes a symbol of “meditation with backbone”—inner cultivation that requires a stable body. (china.usc.edu)
Chapter 6 — Yijin Jing: “muscle-tendon changing” and the problem of attribution
The Yijin Jing is often treated online as “Bodhidharma’s secret manual”.
But academically, it’s much more nuanced. An Oxford-hosted paper discusses the Yijin jing of 1624 and how it describes martial training practiced in Chinese communities. (ORA)
Beginner translation:
Even if the training is real and valuable, the origin story may be later than the legend says.
This is not a problem—it’s an opportunity to teach discernment (which your audience will respect).
The deeper (more academic) layer: what “India influenced Qi Gong” can actually mean
If we strip away the internet myths, “India influenced Qi Gong” can mean at least three things—each with different levels of evidence.
1) Shared human discoveries (convergent evolution)
When humans sit still, breathe slowly, and pay attention… similar outcomes happen:
calmer nervous system
steadier focus
improved interoception (inner sensing)
better self-regulation
So some similarities between yoga and Qi Gong may be human physiology more than direct borrowing.
2) Practice transfer in medieval China (documented intersections)
This is where your article can get really interesting.
Scholarly work explores intersections between Indian yogic/postural traditions and Chinese daoyin. For example, Livia Kohn’s comparative work explicitly treats yoga and daoyin side by side in history and technique. (Deutsches Kampfsportmuseum)
And David Steavu’s work (Journal of Yoga Studies) investigates how Indian postural therapies and daoyin intersected historically. (journalofyogastudies.org)
This supports a careful claim like:
“China had its own daoyin tradition, and medieval periods also saw Indian-labelled postural methods appearing in Chinese contexts.”
That’s far stronger than “Qi Gong came from India.”
3) Monastic life as the mixing bowl
Monks are travellers. Temples are hubs. Translation projects require long sitting. Long sitting requires healthy bodies.
So monasteries become the perfect place for:
breath methods
posture refinement
movement sets
and internal training
to be tested, combined, and preserved.
That’s a realistic “umbrella” model.
Join the Academy Today
What about “Vedic martial arts” and Southeast Asia?
The strong version is hard to prove
Claims like “Bodhidharma brought Kalaripayattu to Shaolin and created kung fu” are widespread online, but they’re often supported by modern retellings rather than primary historical documents.
The grounded version is still fascinating
What we can say is:
Indian bodily disciplines (wrestling, conditioning, breath culture, yogic practices) are ancient and diverse.
Buddhism travelled through South and Southeast Asia via maritime networks for centuries. (courtauld.ac.uk)
Chinese embodied practices (daoyin) are also ancient and documented early. (hnmuseum.com)
Scholars explicitly study medieval cross-cultural “knowledge transfer” of bodily practices between India and China. (ResearchGate)
There was likely a two-way exchange of breath-and-body methods across Buddhist networks—especially in monastic settings—rather than a single moment where one system ‘created’ the other. (ResearchGate)
The “one umbrella” model: energy cultivation across traditions
In India (broadly speaking)
Yoga (ethical framework + postures + concentration)
Pranayama (breath regulation and energy control)
Meditation traditions (many lineages)
In China (broadly speaking)
Daoyin (guiding/pulling—therapeutic movement)
Yangsheng (nourishing life)
Neigong / internal training (cultivating internal strength and energy)
Qi Gong (a modern umbrella term that gathers many older streams)
In Buddhist temple life (across regions)
Meditation discipline (sustained attention training)
Walking meditation / movement practice
Body conditioning (to support long practice)
Breath training (to stabilise attention)
Breath is the bridge between body and mind.
And interestingly, modern academic discussions of subtle energy concepts note that different cultures name similar ideas: qi, prana, and others. (PMC)
If the “one umbrella” view helps you (different languages for life-force training), these pages make it practical and grounded:
A short “history vs legend” box you can reuse in multiple articles
History:
China’s daoyin tradition is old and evidenced (e.g., Mawangdui exercise chart). (hnmuseum.com)
Shaolin is historically dated to 495 CE and linked to Buddhist transmission networks. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Temple tradition:
Bodhidharma is credited in later tradition with supporting Shaolin training and meditation. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Debated attribution:
Yijin Jing’s authorship and Bodhidharma link are contested; scholarship treats the text history as later than popular legend suggests. (ORA)
Why this story is still worth telling (even with uncertainty)
Discernment without cynicism.
You don’t have to throw away tradition to be intelligent.
You don’t have to cling to myths to feel wonder.
You can hold both:
the beauty of lineage stories, and
the grounded honesty of historical scholarship.
That is a very “mystery school” way to think, actually.
What this means for your Qi Gong practice today
Here’s the practical takeaway that turns history into impact:
1) Practise like a monk, not like a performer
Qi Gong works best when it’s:
consistent
gentle
sensation-led
nervous-system friendly
2) Let breath lead
No forcing. No strain.
Your goal is smoothness—the kind that quiets the inner noise.
3) Train attention like a skill
A little daily practice trains the mind to return—again and again.
And if you want a simple structure that builds steadily, start here:
https://brightbeingsacademy.com/qi-gong-for-beginners
Next steps on your Qi Gong Journey
You can practise Qi Gong at the Bright Beings Academy. There are different types of membership to suit your level and comitment. See below for the choices you have at the Bright Beings Academy.
FAQs on Origins of Qi Gong
Did Qi Gong originate in India?
Qi Gong is widely understood as Chinese in origin, rooted in daoyin/yangsheng traditions, while Buddhist transmission likely supported cross-cultural exchange of methods over time. (Deutsches Kampfsportmuseum)
Is Bodhidharma definitely the creator of Shaolin Kung Fu?
Most strong “creator” claims are better treated as temple tradition and later legend. Britannica phrases it as being “credited with” aiding training and meditation. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Is the Yijin Jing definitely Bodhidharma’s text?
The attribution is disputed; scholarship discusses later textual history (e.g., 17th-century context). (ORA)
What is the earliest “evidence-like” marker for daoyin/Qigong-style movement?
The Mawangdui exercise chart shows a structured system of illustrated exercises (44 figures) and is commonly used as a key early reference point for daoyin traditions. (hnmuseum.com)
Why include Southeast Asia at all?
Because Buddhism travelled by maritime networks linking South and Southeast Asia for centuries, providing real-world channels for practice exchange beyond overland routes. (courtauld.ac.uk)
References and further reading (credible starters)
Henan Museum: Mawangdui “Physical Exercise Chart on Silk” (44 figures). (hnmuseum.com)
Encyclopædia Britannica: Shaolin Temple history (construction beginning 495). (Encyclopedia Britannica)
USC China Centre: Shaolin established 495; early Indian monk Batuo (Buddhabhadra). (china.usc.edu)
Encyclopædia Britannica: Bodhidharma “credited with” aiding Shaolin monks’ meditation and training. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Oxford (Elisabeth Hsu): discussion of the Yijin jing of 1624 in practice contexts. (ORA)
Livia Kohn (PDF reprint): Yoga and Daoyin comparative history and technique. (Deutsches Kampfsportmuseum)
Journal of Yoga Studies (David Steavu): intersections of Indian postural therapies and daoyin. (journalofyogastudies.org)
Courtauld (Andrea Acri): “Maritime Buddhism” (sea-based transmission). (courtauld.ac.uk)
Related reading on Bright Beings Academy
Key historical sources (for readers who want to go deeper)
Enskillment into the Environment: the Yijin jing Worlds of Jin and Qi (Oxford ORA PDF)
Maritime Southeast Asia Between South Asia and China to the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge)
Esoteric Buddhist Networks along the Maritime Routes (A. Acri PDF)
I look forward to connecting with you again in the next post.
Until then, be well and keep shining.
Peter. :)
